Search in This Blog

Tampilkan postingan dengan label AAVSO. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label AAVSO. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 03 November 2013

Speakers Bureau

Another interesting outreach initiative from the AAVSO is the Speakers Bureau. The Speakers Bureau is a service established for people and groups looking for enthusiastic, knowledgeable speakers to provide informative presentations for astronomy clubs, star parties, banquets, Scout Troops, Astronomy Day activities and other public and private astronomy functions.

You can see a list of the available speakers, along with the list of topics they can cover here. This is only a list of topics the speakers have spoken to in the past. If you're looking for something specific, just ask. We can probably accommodate you.

Most speakers are willing to travel a reasonable distance, generally two hours drive from home, free of charge. Reimbursement for speaking engagements requiring more miles and time can be negotiated on an individual basis with the speakers themselves. The speakers' home town and distance they will travel are included on the web page.

To request a speaker for your astronomical function simply send an email to aavso at aavso dot org with 'Speakers Bureau' in the title. We will put you in touch with the individual you request or suggest one for you.

Some of the speakers from the bureau and I will be giving talks at this years Astronomical League Convention (ALCon 2009) in New York, NY this August. If you are going to attend, look me up. I'm always glad to get to know fellow astronomers.


If you are unable to get a speaker for your event due to time, money or geographical challenges, AAVSO also offers a library of ready-made PowerPoint presentations you can use to give a talk yourself. These are available free for download from the AAVSO Education and Outreach Pages.

Refining the Distance Scale

I scan the new astrophysics papers regularly. I almost always find something I end up downloading and reading, either right then and there, or later when I have time to concentrate. Rarely do I stumble across a paper that I can't take my eyes away from, like a great novel. One of those times when, forsaking all else, you must get to the last page.

Yesterday I found a great paper. What I was most pleased with was the fact it was written in plain English, with good grammar and organization. I understood every bit of it from start to end! That almost never happens. I couldn't stop reading it.

I don't have a PhD in astronomy or physics. I do this because I love it, period. So I often find myself part way into a paper on some astrophysical phenomena that the author is trying to explain, but no lights are going on in my brain. Either the subject is too technical for me to grasp, or the author is writing about things at a level only the top five experts in the world would ever understand. Add the poor English skills of foreign scientists writing in a second language and things can get ugly fast.

At some point I have to decide to either suck it up and plow through, hoping that a light will come on somewhere in the process, or skim through the rest to see if anything interesting develops with the plot.

Rarely do I find myself whooping it up and commenting out loud about the paper in my hands.

Okay, enough teasing. The paper is Absolute Magnitudes of Dwarf Novae: Murmurs of Period Bounce by Joe Patterson. Obviously, the subject appeals to me because dwarf novae are my special area of interest. But let me quote you some examples of why I was so impressed with this paper.

The first paragraph:
"Distance is the sine qua non of astrophysics. A distance estimate is required to convert flux to luminosity, and stellar physics is all about luminosity, not flux. Unfortunately, distances to cataclysmic variables are particularly difficult to estimate, because the dominant light source is not a star, but an accretion disk- preventing straightforward application of physical methods developed for single stars."

That will never be stated more clearly, ever. Yet it has a conversational tone to it that invites you in to take a look around. Remember, this is a scientific paper!

There are some other gems near the beginning that particularly caught my attention.

"In the 1980's available data on dwarf nova eruptions consisted of a blend of photographic and visual magnitudes. But now we have access to searchable variable star records, especially that of the AAVSO. The human eye is the ideal detector for this purpose, since it is immune to changes in technology, and used by thousands of observers. Furthermore, the central wavelengths of the eye and the commonly used Johnson V filter are similar; and both detectors are broad enough to render line emission insignificant."

He gives praise to the observations of amateur observers, the AAVSO and explains why visual observations are scientifically valuable all in one breath! I have a new hero.

I won't spoil it by giving away the end, and if you want to find out what period bouncers are you're going to have to read the paper.

I'm going to print it out on fine paper, have it bound in a nice little cover, and get Joe to autograph it for me when I see him in Tucson later this month at the CV conference, 'Wild Stars in the Old West.'

Wild Stars- Looking Back

One of the best things about going to these meetings is you learn what astronomers are really looking at, researching, observing with space telescopes and how much the AAVSO is actually appreciated by the professional community.

There were AAVSO light curves in at least one out of three papers given here every day this week. Astronomers using sophisticated space telescopes and 8 meter telescopes on the ground are using AAVSO light curves of novae, recurrent novae, dwarf novae, symbiotic variables and all manner of CVs in their research.

The paper Brad Schaefer gave on recurrent novae was a virtual smorgasboard of historical AAVSO data. His research would be impossible without us, and he says so enthusiastically in the interview I did with him for the podcast. He has a list of five RN that he predicts will blow up in the next five to ten years, and T Pyx is NOT one of them. He is quite sure it will be the monitoring of these stars by amateurs that will result in the timely notification needed to alert astronomers to the rare opportunities these events present.

The professional CV community has given me a lot of one on one ideas to bring to amateurs about what it is they need and want, and how we can contribute in a meaningful way to their research. Steve Howell, Boris Gaensicke and Paula Szkody, talked with me one on one about what amateurs can do to help and what they have already contributed to the cause.

Personally, I learned a lot at this meeting. I was pretty fuzzy on the current hypothesis on pre-CV evolution, and the difference between symbiotic variables and common envelope binaries. I have a much clearer picture of why population studies are so important to CV
research. I was talking with Arne after the last session and telling him how by Thursday I was even beginning to understand x-ray light curves and recognizing emission, absorption, H alpha and beta lines in optical spectrum. I'm beginning to wonder how many spousal permission units it will cost me to buy a spectrograph!

I have a pretty current understanding now of what the core issues are that CV astronomers are trying to untangle, and what its gonna take to get them there. The exciting thing is WE CAN HELP. There is still a lot for amateurs to do with dwarf novae, symbiotics, recurrent novae (we practically own this field!), novae (lots of interest in novae!), and magnetic variables.

Even better, this was perfect timing, because we will probably launch the new CV Section this year after the spring meeting (if not sooner). I was able to rub elbows with all the top researchers in the field and let them know what we have planned and they are enthusiastic about the role we can play.

I got to spend some time with some of the key players from Japan who contribute to CVnet; and as usual, I was impressed with the way professional astronomers like Joe Patterson, John Thorstensen and Boris Gaensicke are willing to share the love of VSO and advise amateurs on how they can contribute to science.

It was awesome. And now my batteries and enthusiasm are fully charged. I'm glad to be home so I can get back to observing some of these wild stars myself!

Twinkle, Twinkle, Quasi-Star



--> 
"Twinkle, twinkle quasi-star
Biggest puzzle from afar
How unlike the other ones
Brighter than a billion suns
Twinkle, twinkle, quasi-star
How I wonder what you are."

George Gamow, "Quasar" 1964.


The AAVSO recently announced a special observing campaign on several blazars, including the unusual variable object 3C 66A. So, what the devil is 3C 66A, and what is a blazar?

In the 1960�s advances in radio and x-ray astronomy opened our eyes to new classes of objects we�d never even imagined before. Some of these early discoveries were radio sources we believed were associated with stellar objects. The Third Cambridge Catalogue of Radio Sources (3C) is an astronomical catalogue of celestial radio sources. It was published by the Radio Astronomy Group of the University of Cambridge in 1959. Entries in this catalogue use the prefix 3C followed by a space, then the sequential discovery number, such as 3C 48. In the case of 3C 66A there are two sources very close together in the sky, so they are given an additional letter suffix, resulting in the names 3C 66A and 3C 66B.

3C 66A was one of these radio stars. As hints of their true nature began to unfold, astronomers began calling them Quasi Stellar Radio Sources, which was eventually shortened to �quasars�. The spectrum of 3C 273 taken during an occultation by the moon finally revealed that these radio stars were actually galaxies. Even more remarkably, these were the most distant galaxies known, billions of light years away.

Like quasars, blazars appear star-like optically. They emit energy in radio wavelengths as well as all other wavelengths up to gamma-rays. Due to their variability in optical and other wavelengths, these objects have all come to be known as Active Galactic Nuclei, or AGNs. Blazars are the most variable of all the AGNs and can change in brightness by up to a factor of 100 in a few months. BL Lacertae is the prototype of this class, and as you can guess by the name was first thought to be a variable star.

AAVSO 1000 day light curve of 3C 66A
The engines that power these active galaxies are believed to be supermassive black holes residing in the nucleus of the galaxy. These super compact objects can possess the mass and gravitational pull of a million to a few billion Suns. Surrounding the massive central region is an accretion disk. Beyond that is a doughnut-shaped torus of dust and gas extending out another couple of light-years, which glows in the infrared.

Due to the physics of accretion disks, the inner disk rotates more quickly than the outer portions. The inner parts near the black hole are spinning so rapidly and are so hot that very high-energy wavelengths are generated. Gas and dust spiral in towards their eventual doom, like water circling a giant cosmic drain. A massive amount of energy is emitted when matter accretes onto the black hole via the accretion disk, and vast amounts of gravitational energy are released as the matter gets sucked down the drain and disappears from the universe.

In some AGNs, radio jets are produced which protrude perpendicular from the disk, spewing energetic particles at nearly the speed of light. Our point of view relative to these jets is what distinguishes the different types of AGN.


Looking at the jet straight on, right down the barrel of the beast, we see blazars and quasars. However, if the jet is not pointed in our direction, the dusty disk of the galaxy lies in our line of sight, and we see what are called Seyfert galaxies.

So the answer to our initial question, what is 3C 66A?
It is an active galactic nucleus, a quasar, a blazar, and a variable source of radiation in optical and other wavelengths, powered by a supermassive black hole in a galaxy billions of light years away.

Why has the AAVSO asked observers to monitor this crazy cosmic catastrophy?

Observations have been requested by Dr. Markus Boettcher, from Ohio University, in a study he and his colleagues are making of several blazars. These AGN are being intermittently monitored by VERITAS (the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System), a four-telescope collection designed to detect sources of very high energy (VHE) gamma-rays. If a VHE gamma-ray outburst is detected by VERITAS, target-of-opportunity observations with the Newton X-ray Multi-Mirror (XMM) telescope will be triggered.

The VERITAS telescope array

Since VERITAS is not regularly monitoring the targets, optical monitoring by observers on the ground is crucial to alert the VERITAS collaboration if any one of the blazars on their list enters a high state of activity. AAVSO observers will essentially act as fire spotters, and if we see smoke, professional astronomers will turn the big guns on these blazing beasts.

Details of the campaign and the list of targets can be found in AAVSO Alert Notice 353.

I have observed 3C 66A for years. Partly because it is a variable object, but also because it is remarkable as the most distant thing I can actually see in my 12� telescope. Now I have an even better reason to watch it closely in the coming months. My observations, from my humble back yard observatory, could trigger target of opportunity observations of the XMM Newton satellite. You have to admit, that�s cool.

Astronomy.FM Every Day-and Friday Night!


From modest beginnings, Astronomy.FM has begun to really gain traction in the online astronomy community. If you haven't heard the buzz you can tune in any time to see what is happening. Astronomy.FM Radio has astronomy related programming running 24 hours a day. Note: the Radio Schedule is in Universal Time.

Some well-known favorites are on the air each week- Astronomy Cast, 365 Days of Astronomy, Are We Alone?, Skepticality, The Naked Scientists, and if you haven't heard Space Pirate Radio! you are missing some real fun.

Friday night at 9PM EST (Sat 02:00UT) I will be on the air LIVE with Marty Kunz on the Event Horizon show. We'll be talking about the AAVSO, variable stars, cataclysmic variables, Citizen Sky, epsilon Aurigae, and whatever else we can squeeze into an hour show. If you miss the live show because you're on a hot date or out at the telescope, the taped show will run every four hours Saturday UT.

I'm looking forward to joining Marty, and I hope you tune it to check out the show. But you don't have to wait until Friday. There is something cool going on at Astronomy.FM all day, every day. Check it out!

U Sco: Long Anticipated Eruption Has Begun

Today, two amateur astronomers from Florida detected a rare outburst of the recurrent nova U Scorpii, which set in motion satellite observations by the Hubble Space Telescope, Swift and Spitzer. The last outburst of U Scorpii occurred in February of 1999. Observers around the planet will now be observing this remarkable system intensely for the next few months trying to unlock the mysteries of white dwarfs, interacting binaries, accretion and the progenitors of Type IA supernovae.

Artists rendition of recurrent nova RS Oph 
Image credit: David Hardy and PPARC

One of the remarkable things about this outburst is it was predicted in advance by Dr. Bradley Schaefer, Louisiana State University, so observers of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) have been closely monitoring the star since last February, waiting to detect the first signs of an eruption. This morning, AAVSO observers, Barbara Harris and Shawn Dvorak sent in notification of the outburst, sending astronomers scrambling to get �target of opportunity observations� from satellites and continuous coverage from ground-based observatories. Time is a critical element, since U Sco is known to reach maximum light and start to fade again in one day.

There are only ten known recurrent novae (RNe). This, coupled with the fact that eruptions may occur only once every 10-100 years, makes observations of this rare phenomenon extremely interesting to astronomers. Recurrent novae are close binary stars where matter is accreting from the secondary star onto the surface of a white dwarf primary. Eventually this material accumulates enough to ignite a thermonuclear explosion that makes the nova eruption. �Classical novae� are systems where only one such eruption has occurred in recorded history. They may indeed have recurrent eruptions, but these may occur thousands or millions of years apart. RNe have recurrence times of 10-100 years.

The difference is thought to be the mass of the white dwarf. The white dwarf must be close to the Chandrasekhar limit, 1.4 times the mass of the Sun. This higher mass makes for a higher surface gravity, which allows a relatively small amount of matter to reach the ignition point for a thermonuclear runaway. White dwarfs in RNe are thought to be roughly 1.2 times solar, or greater. The rate at which mass is accreted onto the white dwarf must be relatively high also. This is the only way to get enough material accumulated onto the white dwarf in such a short time, as compared to classical novae.

Recurrent novae are of particular interest to scientists because they may represent a stage in the evolution of close binary systems on their way to becoming Type IA supernovae. As mass builds up on the white dwarf they may eventually reach the tipping point, the Chandrasekhar limit. Once a white dwarf exceeds this mass it will collapse into a Type IA supernova.

A problem with this theory is the mass that is blown off the white dwarf in the eruption. If more mass is ejected during an eruption than has accreted during the previous interval between eruptions, the white dwarf will not be gaining mass and will not collapse into a Type IA supernovae. Therefore, scientists are eager to obtain all the data they can on these eruptions to determine what is happening with the white dwarf, the mass that is ejected and the rate of accretion.


 Observations from amateur astronomers are requested by the AAVSO. Data from backyard telescopes will be combined with data from mountaintop observatories and space telescopes to help unravel the secrets of these rare systems. AAVSO finder charts with comparison star sequences are available at: http://www.aavso.org/observing/charts/vsp/index.html?pickname=U%20Sco

Amateur Astronomers Alert the World to a Rare Stellar Eruption

Barbara had gone to bed late and really didn�t feel like getting up this morning, but her dog had other ideas. So she reluctantly got out of bed to let the dog out, and like every other clear morning this month, she fired up the telescope and CCD and pointed toward U Scorpii.

When the first image appeared on her computer there was a huge over exposed star right in the middle of the field. Barbara couldn�t believe her eyes. In fact, she didn�t believe her eyes. Just yesterday she had measured U Sco at 18.2V. She quickly took another much shorter exposure, double-checked the position, �and that�s when I started to get excited�, she said.

Dr. Barbara Harris, an amateur astronomer, had been monitoring the recurrent nova, U Sco, for months, in anticipation of a rare eruption that had been predicted by Dr. Bradley Schaefer, an astronomer at Louisiana State University. Barbara and many other observers, participating in a campaign coordinated by the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) had begun monitoring U Sco in February 2009. Now on a clear, clam morning in Florida, the moment had arrived!

�Back in December, I had gotten an email from Brad Schaefer, because I had obtained the first image of U Sco as it came out from behind the Sun�, explained Barbara. The image had helped astronomers determine that U Sco had not gone into outburst while it was in conjunction with the Sun. �They were sure that it hadn�t gone into outburst, so he emailed me and thanked me, and said, keep submitting your data to AAVSO, but here�s my home phone number. Call me right away if you get something!�

Barb submitted her observation to AAVSO, looked up Brad�s telephone number, and then thought to herself, �Let me take one more image just to be sure. I don�t want to call him this early and wake him up if I�m not sure.� At this point, it was about 5:30 AM EST. So she took another image, calibrated and measured, removed all doubt from her mind, and called Brad Schaefer.

Just on the other side of Orlando, Shawn Dvorak was just waking up to go to the gym. His telescope had been running all night taking data on several variable stars he was monitoring for AAVSO. Shawn had also begun monitoring U Sco again in January, as it peeked out from behind the Sun. It was usually his last observation in the morning, rising high enough to observe just before dawn.

�I almost didn't observe it this morning since I was planning to go to the gym. I'm glad I did!� Shawn wasn�t quite awake yet, and when the first CCD image came up, he thought to himself, �whoa, I'm pointing at the wrong field, there's no star that bright here�. Shawn said, �Barbara Harris spotted the outburst about an hour earlier but I hadn't heard about it yet, so it was quite a surprise to me when I saw this �new� star�. Thinking the telescope had somehow missed the target; he re-imaged the field to convince himself. He then took a series of shorter exposures, so the erupting 8th magnitude star wouldn�t be saturated on the CCD, and kept taking them for the next fifteen minutes as dawn quickly approached.

About this time, the phone rang in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and half-awake, Brad Schaefer lifted the phone to his ear. It was Barbara Harris, telling him U Scorpii was in outburst. � He let out a scream and said thank you, thank you! I�ll start notifying everyone right away�, Barb recalled.

U Sco outburst discovery image: Barbara Harris

Dr. Schaefer has been studying recurrent novae for years, collecting a large database of observations of all the known recurrent novae. His bold prediction that U Sco was going to erupt in 2009.3 plus or minus one year, was the basis for the intensive monitoring campaign by the AAVSO, and was widely publicized as well as published in his recent paper, �Comprehensive Photometric Histories of All Known Recurrent Novae�. As U Sco approached conjunction with the Sun in the fall of 2009 and still hadn�t gone into outburst, astronomers everywhere started to get anxious.

When it erupts, U Sco goes from minimum to maximum, then to one magnitude below peak, in under one day. This makes responding to the first sign of an outburst, and pointing large earth and space-based telescopes in time to cover the early parts of an eruption, a daunting task. At 6AM EST, Dr. Schaefer was on the phone and emailing people to notify observatories and space telescopes the moment had finally come.

At 6:15 AM EST, Dr. Matthew Templeton, observing campaign coordinator for the AAVSO, was just stepping out of the shower when he noticed a voice mail on his phone. Before his hair was dry, a confirmation of the outburst from Shawn Dvorak had been submitted to AAVSO. Matt swung into action, and by 6:45 the first �AAVSO Special Notice� had been sent, alerting observers around the world to begin observing the long anticipated eruption of U Sco.

At 1:30 PM, six hours after Barbara Harris had first detected the outburst, the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) and the INTREGAL (INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory) satellites were observing U Sco in x-rays and gamma rays. Observations from Hawaii and New Zealand were reported and the international campaign to observe U Sco in outburst had begun in earnest. Over the next several months, astronomers will be monitoring the progress of this outburst at nearly all wavelengths of light from radio waves to X-rays using ground-based telescopes and space-borne observatories.

Dr. Arne Henden, Director of the AAVSO, commented, "This again shows the real advantage of the worldwide distribution of amateur astronomers for detecting transient events like this.  Harris and Dvorak could watch U Sco rise over the Atlantic, hours before professional astronomers in the Western U.S. would have a chance.  Then, because of the winter weather for most U.S. professional observatories, amateurs continued monitoring U Sco from New Zealand and Australia, catching the important first hours of the outburst."

Just think; astronomers may have missed the beginning of the eruption entirely if Shawn had decided to go to the gym, or Barb�s dog hadn�t barked and gotten her out of bed. �My dog has been getting cookies and anything he wants all day�, said Barb.

The progress of the U Scorpii outburst can be followed via the AAVSO, who are maintaining a web page devoted to the event, and anyone can view observational data as they are submitted in real time through the AAVSO website.

For more information on U Scorpii and the AAVSO campaign, please visit
http://www.aavso.org/news/usco.shtml, or contact Dr. Matthew Templeton
at matthewt@aavso.org or via telephone at +1 (617) 354-0484.

American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)

The American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) is an international non-profit organization whose mission is: to observe and analyze variable stars; to collect and archive observations for worldwide access; to forge strong collaborations between amateur and professional astronomers; and to promote scientific research and education using variable star data.

The AAVSO website is a wealth of information on variable stars, their types, characteristics and the research being done on them. You can plot light curves of stars in the AAVSO database, or just check the most recent data in the quick look files. 

 Light curve of the unusual star KR Aurigae

Since the founding in 1911, the people of the AAVSO have propelled the field of variable stars forward. That is the true strength and genius of the AAVSO. The members and observers who have propelled variable star science and astronomy forward by their participation and collaborations.

Okay Hubble, You're Safe To Go

The AAVSO has your back.

It's not always obvious why I find observing cataclysmic variables particularly fun and exciting. I admit some nights it seems like a lot of effort for little return. Other nights a whole slew of stars I monitor will all be in outburst at the same time, like so many thermonuclear explosions ignited in space for my viewing pleasure. Occasionally, we get asked to monitor specific stars as part of an AAVSO campaign, in collaboration with professional astronomers in need of specific data.

That was the case early this week. Paula Szkody, an astronomer from the University of Washington, and her team had been approved for time on the Hubble Space Telescope. They planned to observe the cataclysmic variable GW Librae on Wednesday in ultraviolet wavelengths with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS). What they needed from us was pretty simple, but very important. They wanted to be absolutely sure the star was in its faint state, quiescence. The COS is the most sensitive ultraviolet spectrograph ever flown on Hubble. They can't look at anything as bright as 14th magnitude with it without risking damage to the detector. If GW Lib suddenly erupted while HST was pointed at it very bad things could happen, and there are no more scheduled servicing missions.

A handful of observers, including me, were able to observe the system in advance of the HST run, and we reported it was safely inactive at the time. This enabled the mission team to give the go ahead for the HST observations. Me, personally, I dragged myself out of bed at 3AM to get my early morning observation of GW Lib, a star I don't normally monitor because it is so far south, at -25 degrees declination. But, I am well aware of the fact that there aren't that many observers out there willing to do this kind of stuff, and on any given night I might be the only one anywhere looking at the star I am observing. I didn't expect any big reward; just the satisfaction of knowing I did my little part to enable science to push the boundary of our knowledge another inch forward.

Today, I got an email from Paula Szkody, addressed to all seven of the observers who contributed data, thanking us for enabling the team to get the HST COS observation they wanted. She wrote:

"Hi -
I just wanted to thank all you great observers for the data you took in the last few days on GW Lib (esp last night when it was critical to get a magnitude to HST this morning). Your observations enabled HST to give the go-ahead for the COS UV observation to proceed tonight. THANK YOU! "

You mean they wouldn't have pointed that big ole satellite at GW Lib without us telling them it was okay?

That's right. Pretty cool, eh?

Not enough hours in the week

I could have worse problems than being too busy. So I'm not complaining about the way things have been going lately. I'm working on some really exciting projects for the AAVSO, my research is starting to show results and I've got some traveling to do which started last week and continues into June. Unfortunately, when  it gets this crazy the first thing that suffers is usually my blog. I'm sorry if you've already read the Ophiuchus piece and you keep coming here expecting to find some new Simostuff. So, as a way of explaining that it's not me being lazy, let me tell you what I've been up to.

The first, and biggest thing on my plate is writing a proposal for a project which will be the first of its kind ever, and is such a cool idea I wish I'd thought of it- a decadal survey of amateur astronomy and astrophysics. So, what is a decadal survey you ask?

Every ten years, professional astronomers and scientists engage in a two year process to determine what the current state of our knowledge of the universe is, the pressing science questions for the coming decade, and how we should invest billions of tax-payer dollars on satellites, telescopes and other experiments in order to learn the answers to these questions. At the end of the process a summary report, published by the National Academy of Sciences is issued, prioritizing what programs and major initiatives the astronomical community believes show the most promise for advancing the frontiers of human knowledge and offer the maximum scientific return on investment.

This report, the Decadal Survey of Astronomy and Astrophysics, forms the basis for funding decisions made in the following years by NASA, the National Science Foundation and the Department of Defense. The recommendations of this report have resulted in the Hubble, Chandra and Spitzer Space Telescopes, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and its follow on experiment the Planck Surveyor, the Kepler Mission to find earthlike extra-solar planets, the Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA) and the recently launched Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).

We believe it is time to examine the role amateur astronomers, in collaboration with the professional community, can play in the advancement of human knowledge in the coming decade, and propose to undertake a similar initiative, the first of its kind- The International Decadal Survey of Amateur Astronomy and Astrophysics. The goal of this decadal survey will be to carry out an assessment of professional-amateur collaborations in astronomy and astrophysics, and to prepare a concise report, recommending specific projects and areas of scientifically fruitful pro-am collaborations and studies, addressed to professional and amateur astronomical organizations, agencies supporting the field, the governmental committees with jurisdiction over those agencies, the general scientific community, and the public at large.

As project manager, this will probably take up about 20-25% of my time for the next two years, but I think it is so exciting I'm actually looking forward to it. Besides writing a proposal to fund this project, I've been busy writing and talking to people to get letters of support and to gauge their interest and potential to participate in the survey. I've built a website to explain how it will be organized and the time table it will proceed on. You can see it here. Things are progressing nicely, but it is a lot of work.

The Society for Astronomical Sciences (SAS) will be holding their annual symposium in May and I am giving a talk on my Z Cam research, co-authoring on a paper about the decadal survey, and I'm presenting a poster on Photometrica and AAVSOnet.

So, first the research. Z Camelopardalis-type stars (Z Cams or UGZ) are dwarf novae that show cyclic outbursts, but sometimes after an outburst they do not return to their quiescent magnitude. Instead they appear to get stuck, for months or even years, at a brightness of about one magnitude fainter than outburst maximum. These episodes are known as standstills. Z Cam cycle times characteristically range from 10 to 40 days, and their outburst amplitudes are from 2 to 5 magnitudes in V, but standstills are the defining characteristic of the Z Cam stars. Only Z Cams show standstills, so if it doesn't have standstills it isn't a Z Cam.

Above is the light curve for AH Herculis. You can see the up and down light curve where it goes into outburst (gets bright) and then fades back down to 14th magnitude, only to start up again several days later. You can also see the standstill it has been in since last summer on the right. It is stuck around 12.5 mag. It doesn't get bright and it doesn't fade. Standstill.

There are about 50 or so stars that have at one time or another been classified as Z Cam dwarf novae. I argue that the actual number of Z Cams is far less; maybe a dozen or twenty. If I'm right, Z Cams are a rare and interesting type of variable star that has been largely ignored by astronomers up to now. I am coordinating a campaign through the AAVSO CV Section called the Z CamPaign. We've been collecting data on these stars for about 200 days, and I've been examining the light curves of all the known or suspected Z Cams in the AAVSO database, and we've already concluded that several stars long thought to be Z Cams are not, discovered a new phenomena that no one has seen before in two Z Cam stars, and discovered a completely new member of the class. The first paper is written and we're off and running.

Getting Photometrica launched as an online tool for AAVSO members to perform photometry on their CCD images was another project that has recently come to pass. Photometrica is software that exists in a cloud environment. AAVSO doesn't need to buy servers, the software and data storage are hosted by Amazon in their computing cloud. If we need more server capacity, we just pay for more. No maintenance, no hardware, nothing- it just is. So now a member of the AAVSO doesn't need a telescope, CCD, expensive software, or gobs of hard disk storage for images. You can collect data with first class telescopes, the images are automatically uploaded to Photometrica, you log into your account through AAVSO, perform your photometry on the images, generate a report, upload it to the AAVSO database and all you need is internet access. You could literally do this from your IPhone. It's a new world people. One of the dreams is to make this so cheap we can literally give away time and access to developing countries to tech their kids math, science and astronomy.

Speaking of outreach, that leads to my other 'next big thing' on the agenda. I am giving a workshop on variable stars and observing at the North East Astronomy Forum (NEAF) Sunday, April 18, 2010. I am still developing the workshop and working on the presentation. As part of this trip I also had to develop a self-cycling PowerPoint that we can display at our table at NEAF, running from a netbook, projected onto a screen about four feet away in bright lighting. That was a bit of a challenge, but its done. Irene and I leave Friday.

So along with all the regular stuff I have to do every week, there has been a whole new pile of exciting and interesting projects to keep me away from the blog temporarily. But I promise to be back soon. There is no shortage of ideas for articles here either! At last count there were about twenty articles in the drafts folder; mostly pieces I haven't had time to finish because other things took priority. There just aren't enough hours in the week to do it all. But like I said, I could have worse problems.

100 Years of Citizen Science

On October 10, 201 1, the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) will turn 100 years old. To celebrate One Hundred Years of Citizen Science, we have planned grass roots outreach, website features, observing challenges and two meetings to commemorate this historic occasion.

So what is the AAVSO, and what is all the fuss about?

The AAVSO is a worldwide, non-profit, scientific and educational organization of amateur and professional astronomers who are interested in stars that change in brightness�variable stars. Since the beginning, the AAVSO has been based on the cooperation between professional and amateur astronomers to collect, archive and analyze variable star data.

Observing variable stars and publishing the observations in astronomical publications had established a toehold in Europe in the 1880�s, but it wasn�t until Harvard College Observatory Director, Edward C. Pickering, began making appeals to American amateurs in the 1890�s that interest began to grow in the United States.

William Tyler Olcott quickly fanned the interest sparked by Pickering into a small fire. Olcott was an amateur astronomer and lawyer who heard Pickering give a talk about variable stars at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1909. In March 1911, Popular Astronomy published an article by Olcott titled "Variable Star Work for the Amateur with Small Telescopes." Olcott echoed Pickering's earlier appeals to amateur astronomers to use their instruments to engage in citizen science by writing:

 �It is a fact that only by the observation of variable stars can the amateur turn his modest equipment to practical use, and further to any great extent the pursuit of knowledge in its application to the noblest of the sciences.�

In October of 1911 the AAVSO was organized. It had 13 members. Headquarters was Olcott�s house on Church Street in Cambridge, MA. William Tyler Olcott single-handedly performed the duties of all the officers while the organization is in its infancy.

In 1912, Henrietta Swan Leavitt discovered the relationship between Cepheid variables period and their luminosity, allowing astronomers to calibrate distances farther out into space than ever before. Variable stars were about to become very important.

In the early days of the AAVSO, observers concentrated on the known long period variables. The variations of these stars were several magnitudes and the periods from maximum to minimum and back were on the order of hundreds of days. This made them ideally suited to careful visual observers armed with comparison charts with assigned magnitudes of comparison stars.

Training observers, organizing and encouraging them, producing and distributing variable star charts and collecting, recording and publishing the results became the responsibility of the officers of the organization. The Director was actually called the Recorder for the first few decades of the AAVSO�s history.

When the AAVSO was incorporated in 1918, there were perhaps a few hundred known long period variable stars. By the time Olcott died in 1936 there were tens of thousands of known variables, far too many for professional astronomers and the observatories of the day to hope to be able to monitor.

To put this era into historical perspective, astronomers were just beginning to sort out the spectral sequence and its meaning. Most believed that all stars started out their lives as hot and bright and got cooler and faded as they matured. The Hertzsprung-Russel Diagram was thought to represent this stellar evolution model, with stars being born on the hot, luminous upper left of the diagram and evolving to the cooler fainter end at the bottom right of the H-R Diagram. What fueled the stars and how long they lasted was still beyond our understanding. The real picture of stellar evolution and the composition and structure of the interiors of stars were still decades away. That amateur astronomers could record the baffling pulsations of variable stars and potentially help unlock the secrets to the stars must have seemed as amazing then as it does now.

Little did they know that variable stars would be fundamental in our understanding of the life cycles of stars and the history and fate of the Universe. Annie Jump Cannon was just sorting out the spectral classes by temperature into the familiar OBAFGKM sequence.

In 1915 Harlow Shapley used Cepheids to figure out the size and shape of the Milky Way, and our solar system�s place within it. That same year, Leon Campbell became Recorder of the AAVSO.

In 1918 Harvard College Observatory offered the AAVSO an office in Building A of the observatory. It was the first of only a handful of addresses the organization would occupy in the first 100 years.

In 1924, Edwin Hubble discovered Cepheid variables in the Andromeda Galaxy. That answered the question of whether the Milky Way was the Universe or merely one among billions of galaxies that populate a Universe much more vast that we imagined. Five years later the amazing announcement that the Universe is expanding was made and not only that, but the galaxies farthest away were receding from us faster than the closer galaxies.

Throughout this time, citizen scientists continued to diligently record and archive the changes of mysterious variable stars, while astronomers examined the cosmos in a whole new light.

Some time in 1942 the AAVSO archived its one-millionth observation. In 1946, after 35 years as the head of the AAVSO, Leon Campbell stepped down as Recorder and Margaret Mayall took over stewardship of the organization. The number and complexity of distributing comparison charts grew exponentially as did the job of collecting and archiving the observations. Then in December 1953, Harvard College Observatory decided variable star science wasn�t important enough to devote office space to anymore, and the AAVSO was asked to vacate HCO by January 1, 1953.

AAVSO Administrative Assistant, Helen Stephanski (left)
and Director Margaret Mayall, 1953.
Kicked to the curb, forced to fend for itself or die, the AAVSO was once again without a formal address. After months of searching, Margaret Mayall found a 400 square foot office in Cambridge to move the AAVSO into. Margaret worked for the AAVSO for free for most of this time and the AAVSO�s 50th anniversary in 1961 came and went without a lot of fanfare or celebration. Just keeping the doors open was an every day challenge.

Technology, computers, the space race and man on the Moon brought about dramatic changes in the world of astronomy in the 60�s and 70�s. In 1965 AAVSO moved again, into slightly bigger offices where it remained for 12 years, and in 1967 the AAVSO entered the computer age with punch card data entry.

In 1974, Janet Mattei became the Director of the AAVSO. Ten years later, the AAVSO International Database contained 5 million observations, and the data was being used by professional astronomers to examine the dynamics of stellar interiors and stellar evolution. AAVSO observers collected information on more types of variable stars than ever before. Cepheids, RR Lyraes, cataclysmic variables, novae, supernovae, R CrBs and some stars that defied classification.

Finally, in 1986, the AAVSO was able to purchase its own building. The AAVSO opened the doors to its new headquarters in August, just around the corner from the offices of Sky and Telescope magazine in Cambridge. The AAVSO had arrived as a force in astronomical research and Janet Mattei and the 25 Birch Street address became familiar to astronomers around the planet.

By the 1990�s the international aspect of the AAVSO was undeniable. Working in cooperation with other variable star organizations in North and South America, Britain, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Japan as well as having members and active observers in dozens of countries around the world.

In 1995, the AAVSO became accessible to the world via the Internet when it launched its first website. Our connection to NASA and the space and astronomy community became stronger and the AAVSO released Hands On Astrophysics, an educational program aimed at teaching math and science through variable stars, funded by a grant from NASA.

It wasn�t long before astronomers using space telescopes were asking AAVSO observers to monitor cataclysmic variables and other objects from the ground simultaneously while they observed them from space in other wavelengths. Some of our basic understanding of the geometry and structure of accretion disks and the stars in compact binaries came from studies of SS Cygni made by AAVSO observers in conjunction with space satellites. Often times, the satellites would be directed to point at specific targets of opportunity based on reports of stellar activity from AAVSO observers.

In 2002, the AAVSO International Database reached 10.5 million observations. In March of 2004, Janet Mattei, the heart, soul and face of the AAVSO, passed away unexpectedly. It took a year to select a successor, but finally in 2005, Arne Henden became the first Director appointed in the 21st century.

Oddly enough, the AAVSO was facing some of the same challenges it had faced before. The success of the organization had resulted in our outgrowing the Birch Street offices, and when Sky and Telescope announced they were moving and their buildings were for sale, the AAVSO made an offer to purchase and in 2007 moved into the former Sky and Telescope offices.

The AAVSO International Database now contains over 19 million observations and is growing exponentially. Our observers use large sophisticated telescopes, visually and with CCDs to collect more and better observations each year. Some of our observers are able to measure the minute change in light output from a planet crossing in front of a distant star, something William Tyler Olcott could never have imagined.

It is impossible to know where the next one hundred years will lead us, but if you want to be a citizen scientists studying the stars come join us at www.aavso.org.

I�ll leave you with this warning about the addictive nature of variable star observing, experienced by one hundred years of variable star observers.

If you show signs of star susceptibility you should approach the observing of variable stars with the utmost caution. It is easy to become an addict and, as usual, the longer the indulgence is continued the more difficult it becomes to make a clean break and go back to a normal life.

Reach For The Citizen Sky

The press release for Citizen Sky came out yesterday. It was picked up on right away by WIRED magazine. Here is the official version, complete with awesome illustrations.



This fall a bright star will begin a puzzling transformation that only happens every 27 years. To help study this event, astronomers have launched a new citizen science project called �CitizenSky� at www.citizensky.org.



Epsilon Aurigae is a bright star that can be seen with the unaided eye even in bright urban areas of the northern hemisphere from fall to spring. This Fall it is predicted to gradually lose half its brightness until early winter. It will remain faint during all of 2010 before slowly regaining its normal brightness by the summer of 2011.



--> An artistic representation by Citizen Sky participant Brian Thieme of the epsilon Aurigae system as seen at high inclination and from within the system. Image credit: www.citizensky.org and Brian Thieme


Since its discovery in 1821, the cause of this dip in brightness has remained a mystery to astronomers. But this time they have a powerful new resource to help study the upcoming event: thousands of citizen scientists.



�This star is too bright to be observed with the vast majority of professional telescopes, so this is another area where public help is needed,� said Dr. Arne Henden, director of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO).



Supported by a three-year grant from the National Science Foundation, CitizenSky will recruit, train, and coordinate public participation in this project. What makes this project different from previous citizen science projects is its emphasis on participation in the full scientific method. Participants are not being asked simply to collect data. They will also be trained to analyze data, create and test their own hypotheses, and to write papers for publication in professional astronomy journals. Participants can work alone on all phases of the project or they can focus on one stage and team up with others.



�Citizen science can be much more than data collection. Participants often have real-world experience and/or advanced degrees in areas that can be applied to astronomy. Our goal is to introduce the public to authentic science and at the same time use this talent to help astronomers,� Henden said.



The lead astronomer for this project is Dr. Robert Stencel, the William Herschel Womble Professor of Astronomy at Denver University. Dr. Bob, as the amateur astronomy community knows him, studied the last event in 1982-84 while working at NASA. �This is truly an amazing star system. It contains both a supergiant star and a mysterious companion. If the supergiant was in our solar system, its diameter would extend to Earth, engulfing us,� Stencel said. �The companion only makes its presence known every 27 years and is a type of �dark matter� in that we indirectly detect its presence but don�t know what it is.



�To make things even more fun, we also have some evidence of a substantial mass, perhaps a large planet, spiraling into the mysterious dark companion object. Observations during the upcoming eclipse will be key to understanding this and predicting what will happen if the putative planet does eventually fall into the star,� Dr. Bob added.





--> An artistic representation by Citizen Sky participant Nico Comargo of the epsilon Aurigae system as seen at low inclination. Image credit: www.citizensky.org and Nico Comargo


CitizenSky is a collaboration of the AAVSO, Denver University, Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum, Johns Hopkins University, and the California Academy of Sciences. The United Nations and the United States Congress have both endorsed 2009 as the International Year of Astronomy (IYA). CitizenSky was developed as part of the coordinated United States� IYA effort.



The AAVSO (www.aavso.org) is one of the oldest citizen science organizations in the United States. It has been training and coordinating amateur astronomers since 1911. Their database of variable star brightness estimates includes over 18 million observations of over 8,000 stars. They currently have around 1,200 active observers located in 45 countries. They also publish the Journal of the AAVSO, a professionally-reviewed publication in which amateur astronomers can publish research papers.





Catching Up

Okay, I'm back! After a rare two week hiatus, we have quite a bit of catching up to do!

While preparing for the AAVSO fall meeting, and then away attending the meeting, I haven't had time to keep you all up to date on what is going on in the variable star and astronomy world that whirls around me each week. So we'll take a few steps back and then plow forward.

October 31, AAVSO announced a special request for observations of 3C 66A, an active galaxy in Andromeda, while it is in its current highly active bright state. I planned to write a blog about this since it is one of my favorite variable objects, and at 2 billion light years, the furthest object I can actually see in my telescope. I hope to write about it this week, but there is a lot of new activity that may take priority over it.

Also just at the end of October the fourth nova in Sagittarius for 2009 was discovered. It is now known as V5584 Sgr. Just yesterday, a new possible nova was discovered in Scutum.

Saturday, November 7, the Slacker Astronomy crew, Michael, Doug and I, aired an episode on 365 Days of Astronomy about the recent, extremely bright, bolide that exploded over Canada, very near our friend Doug's university!

The AAVSO Cataclysmic Variable Section has begun a long-term observing campaign to monitor Z Cam type dwarf novae. I presented the first of what will be several research papers on this at the fall meeting November 7.

I've also started a new web site devoted to Z Cams that I hope will become the authoritative reference on this topic in years to come. I'll be writing more about this exciting project in the weeks to come. This news has not been announced anywhere else except at the AAVSO meeting last weekend, so you readers are getting a scoop here.

Previews of other things coming down the pipe

I interviewed Caroline Moore, the youngest person to discover a supernova, at the fall meeting. She is an incredible young lady. That will be airing as part of a Slacker Astronomy podcast soon.

I have another 365 Days of Astronomy Simostronomy podcast coming up December 7. Its called 'Don't lick the telescope, and other observing tips for winter.'

I received an advance copy of 'The Monthly Sky Guide' by Ian Ridpath and Wil Tirion, so there will be a book review coming soon.

Something notable always seems to happen just around the holidays, a new nova, a rare CV outburst, or something else. What will it be this year? Stay tuned, and we'll find out together.

The Z CamPaign

Introduction
UGZs are defined in the General Catalog of Variable Stars as dwarf novae that �show cyclic outbursts, differing from UGSS variables by the fact that sometimes after an outburst they do not return to the original brightness, but during several cycles retain a magnitude between maximum and minimum. The values of cycles are from 10 to 40 days, while light amplitudes are from 2 to 5 magnitudes in V.�

So it�s all about the standstills, those episodes where the star gets stuck at a mid-point between maximum and minimum. If it doesn�t exhibit standstills it isn�t a Z Cam star.


Typical standstill of Z Camelopardalis

So UGZ can be classified by their light curves alone. Orbital period is not a factor in classification, even though they all tend to be on the long side of the period gap, 3 hours to 10 hours orbital period.
There is no strong agreement between the various CV catalogs as to which few dozen or so stars are actually Z Cam type systems. There are a handful of bright objects that have been densely covered by amateurs throughout their range that are obviously UGZ from their light curves. They show the typical Z Cam-like standstills, have short outburst cycles and amplitudes around 3 or 4 magnitudes.

There are also some bright systems listed as UGZ, like AB Draconis, that have the short cycle and small amplitude, don�t show obvious standstills, and yet it seems everyone agrees they are UGZ.


AB Draconis- where are the standstills?

There are many more CVs that have some of the characteristics of UGZ, but it is not at all apparent from the existing data that they show standstill behavior because the range at which you would expect to see this, somewhere mid-point between maximum and minimum brightness, is too faint for visual observes to have accumulated useful data over the years. All we really know from the data is the average outburst cycle and approximate amplitude. There is no detail in the middle where the real story lies.

Depending on which catalog you use, there are only 30 to 40 Z Cam dwarf novae. If any significant percentage of the number of Z Cams eventually proves not to be Z Cam, the remaining few represent a fairly rare and unique class of stars worthy of further investigation.

Oddballs
Other well-quoted characteristics are that �standstills are always initiated by an outburst,� and �standstills always end with a decline to quiescence� (Hellier, 2001). This may be convenient because it fits the expected behavior, if the models are correct, but there are at least three Z Cam stars that appear to go into outburst from standstill, HX Peg, AH Her and AT Cnc. If this is in fact true, it throws a real monkey wrench into current CV theory.

Hibernation
Another interesting idea is that these Z Cams may be part of a population of �hibernating novae.� According to theory, classical novae systems can evolve into hibernating novae when the secondary star underfills its Roche lobe and mass transfer ceases, possibly centuries after eruption, causing the binary to go into hibernation.

Mass loss during the nova event (or events) results in an increase in orbital separation. The secondary, induced by irradiation of the red dwarf's surface by the white dwarf, continues mass transfer onto the white dwarf. Through this continuous mass loss, the secondary star eventually underfills its Roche lobe and mass transfer ceases.

The shell of ionized gas around Z Cam detected by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer
 is explained as the remnant of a full-blown classical nova explosion.

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/M. Seibert(OCIW)/T. Pyle(SSC)/R. Hurt(SSC)

The binary systems that are most likely to go through hibernation after a nova outburst suffer the largest reduction in mass transfer and increase in separation. In particular, systems with a higher mass ratio are more likely to be induced into hibernation.

The Z CamPaign
The list of stars in the Z CamPaign can be found here.
Stars highlighted in yellow are stars that are confirmed UGZ suitable for continued observation by visual observers throughout their cycles. We strongly urge visual observers to continue monitoring these stars for their expected outbursts and standstills.
Stars highlighted in green are stars that visual observers should continue to monitor for outbursts and standstills if or when they may occur.
Stars with no highlights are stars which both visual and CCD observers are encouraged to monitor for outbursts, but the standstills are likely to only be visible to CCD observers due to their relative faintness (15th or 16th magnitude).
Stars highlighted in blue are best suited to CCD observers for monitoring for outbursts and standstill behavior.
Stars highlighted in red are those which appear to go into outburst from standstill. When one of these stars enters a standstill we will be asking for intensive coverage until the star either goes into quiescence or outburst.
We will devote a special place on the home page for notifications and reminders of current Z Cam and suspected Z Cam activity, the Z Cam Corner.
We also plan to build a website devoted to Z Cam and suspected Z Cam stars, with pages for individual stars, finder charts, data tables and links to relevant literature, along the lines of The Big List of SW Sextantis Stars (D. W. Hoard) and Intermediate Polar Home Page (Koji Mukai).

Science Goals
1. To determine convincingly which CVs are indeed UGZ and which are imposters.
2. To improve the overall data available on each of these stars and fill the gaps in the light curves.
3. To determine if some UGZ actually do go into outburst from standstill, or if perhaps we have just missed the sudden drop to quiescence before the next outburst, leading to the appearance of outburst from standstill behavior.
4. To make any other serendipitous discoveries about 'UGZ-ness' that come to light as a result of improved coverage.
5. To publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal such as the Journal of the AAVSO.
Z Cam stars are not the sexy, super-humping members of the CV family. In fact, they are rather ignored for the most part by amateur and professional alike. Perhaps because it is easier to make a classification of a UGSU from only a few nights observations of superhumps, or because the reason for standstills to occur is not well-understood. This leaves the door open for discovery to those patient and persistent enough to devote time and energy to observing this unique class of cataclysmic variable. We hope you will join us in this endeavor.